<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>One New York Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com</link>
	<description>A record of television, music, thoughts, and otherwise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Light At The End Of The Tunnel</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2012/02/24/the-light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2012/02/24/the-light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=4003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super Bowl over. Buzz has worn off. Wedding invitation sent. No turning back now. Planning finished. Work project from hell over. Ready to start writing again. 2011 sucked. 2012 is off to a good start. Here&#8217;s to jinxing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super Bowl over.  Buzz has worn off.</p>
<p>Wedding invitation sent.  No turning back now.</p>
<p>Planning finished.</p>
<p>Work project from hell over.</p>
<p>Ready to start writing again.</p>
<p>2011 sucked.  2012 is off to a good start.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to jinxing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2012/02/24/the-light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Giants Will&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2012/01/17/the-new-york-giants-will/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2012/01/17/the-new-york-giants-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Giants will never go to Tampa and win a road playoff game with Tom Coughlin and Eli Manning. The Giants will never go to Dallas and beat them. Romo is too good and they already lost the Cowboys twice this year. The Giants will never go to Lambeau and take down Brett Favre in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><strike>The Giants will never go to Tampa and win a road playoff game with Tom Coughlin and Eli Manning.</strike></li>
<li><strike>The Giants will never go to Dallas and beat them.  Romo is too good and they already lost the Cowboys twice this year.</strike></li>
<li><strike>The Giants will never go to Lambeau and take down Brett Favre in one of his magical playoff runs</strike></li>
<li><strike>The Giants have no shot to beat the Patriots.  They&#8217;re the best offense of all time.</strike></li>
<li><strike>The Giants won&#8217;t beat the Falcons.  Matty Ice is too good and he&#8217;ll finally get his first win behind this awesome offensive line.</strike></li>
<li><strike>This time, the Giants really won&#8217;t win in Lambeau.  Aaron Rodgers and that offense is way too high powered for the Giants to keep up with.</strike></li>
<li><strike>The Giants can&#8217;t beat the Niners.  Alex Smith is too good and the Harbaugh defense is too much.  A finesse offense has no shot in sloppy Candlestick.</strike></li>
<li>I&#8217;m sorry.  Tom Coughlin and Eli Manning are not as formidable a pair as the Bs.  The Patriots record when they lose to a team in the regular season is 8,659-0.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2012/01/17/the-new-york-giants-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks 2011: Week 17</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/31/nfl-picks-2011-week-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/31/nfl-picks-2011-week-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 08:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Picks 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SU: 11-5 (153-87) ATS: 10-6 (123-117) Sunday Redskins +9 at Eagles: There&#8217;s two ways this game can go. Either the Eagles can quit and decide they want Andy Reid fired. Or, they can play their asses off, kill the Skins, and save his job. Actually, there&#8217;s a 3rd option: Always take more than 3 points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SU: 11-5 (153-87)<br />
ATS: 10-6 (123-117)</p>
<h3>Sunday</h3>
<p><b>Redskins +9 at Eagles</b>: There&#8217;s two ways this game can go.  Either the Eagles can quit and decide they want Andy Reid fired.  Or, they can play their asses off, kill the Skins, and save his job.  Actually, there&#8217;s a 3rd option: Always take more than 3 points in an NFC East game.  <b>Redskins +9</b></p>
<p><b>Niners -9 at Rams</b>: I&#8217;m not a fan of covering big spreads on the road.  I&#8217;m also not a fan of big spreads in games when guys will be out as soon as the game is in hand.  <b>Rams +9</b></p>
<p><b>Lions -2.5 at Packers</b>: This is weird.  Neither team is playing for anything&#8230;. so does that mean Vegas thinks the Lions second string is equally as good as the Packers?  Or that the Lions 2nd string will be trying to lose so they can play the Giants or Cowboys?  <b>Packers cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bears -1 at Vikings</b>: I&#8217;m not a Bears&#8217; fan or anything, but boy I&#8217;d be mad if my team gave away a playoff season by not signing one of like a dozen competent quarterbacks available to try and save a playoff season.  Like&#8230;. signing Kyle Randy wouldn&#8217;t have been worth an extra 2 wins?  And now, knowing the Bears&#8217; history with free agents, they might let Matt Forte walk?  If I were a Bears&#8217; fan, they&#8217;d be as dead to me as the Mets.  <b>Vikings outright</b></p>
<p><b>Panthers +7.5 at Saints</b>: I don&#8217;t know much about the Panthers coach, but if I were him, boy I&#8217;d be excited at the prospect of my offense next year now that I know what I had.  The Cam Newton show is going to be fun to watch for the next few years.  As for this game, I think Drew&#8217;s going to go for 5200 and call it a day.  Oh, and side point: anyone who talked about &#8220;running up the score&#8221; on the Falcons last week &#8212; unless you said the same thing when they beat the Colts by 60 points, shut the fuck up.  Also, there&#8217;s no such thing as &#8220;running up the score&#8221; in professional sports.  It&#8217;s like saying that Coke should be more sporting against Pepsi.  Shut up.  <b>Panthers +7.5</b></p>
<p><b>Titans -2.5 at Texans</b>: Titans playing all out in a game in which the Texans don&#8217;t really care?  <b>Titans cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bills +12.5 at Patriots</b>: PLR&#8217;s grandmother lives about 2 miles from Rich Stadium&#8230;. basically on the same road.  If you don&#8217;t think I was kind of upset that we didn&#8217;t get to do Christmas Dinner there, thus getting Tebow vs. Buffalo as my pregame to Christmas, you don&#8217;t know me very well.  <b>Bills +12.5</b></p>
<p><b>Jets +1 at Dolphins</b>: The Jets do need to actually win this game.  I do think they&#8217;re actually better than the Dolphins.  Thus&#8230;. <b>Jets outright</b></p>
<p><b>Colts +5 at Jaguars</b>: Maurice Jones-Drew.  <b>Jaguars cover</b></p>
<p><b>Chargers +3 at Raiders</b>: This is a really hard game for me to pick.  On one hand, I think the Raiders are actually better than the Chargers this year.  On the other hand, I do think the Chargers are good enough to knock off the Raiders in a division game and ruin any chance they had.  However, as a person who was 100% for the Carson Palmer trade, I have to pick the Raiders even though they&#8217;re having as bad an injury season as the Giants.  <b>Raiders cover</b></p>
<p><b>Seahawks +3 at Cardinals</b>: Eh.  Home team.  <b>Cardinals cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bucs +13.5 at Falcons</b>: Boy, I&#8217;d rather travel to New York or Dallas than New Orleans or San Francisco.  <b>Bucs +13.5</b></p>
<p><b>Ravens -2.5 at Bengals</b>: The Bengals control their own destiny here.  If they win, they make a whole lot of things irrelevant, which is why this is a 4pm game.  However, I think that the Ravens get themselves a bye.  <b>Ravens cover</b></p>
<p><b>Chiefs +3 at Broncos</b>: T&#8230; T&#8230;. Tebow?  <b>Broncos cover</b></p>
<p><b>Steelers -7 at Browns</b>: As the Steelers are playing this game at the same time as the Ravens, I think they&#8217;re still going to go all out.  <b>Steelers cover</b></p>
<p><b>Cowboys +3 at Giants</b>: For the record, having an additional playoff game sucks.  Bad.  I&#8217;m not prepared for it and may have to watch the game somewhere other than my apartment where I can buy a pack of cigarettes and chain smoke somewhere where I can&#8217;t get judgmental glares from the Future Mrs. TDL.  If Osi, Tuck, and JPP are all on the field at the same time, I like the Giants chances &#8212; not just next week, but for the next four.  If they&#8217;re not&#8230;. scared.  I&#8217;m kind of confident the Giants can hang with Dallas score wise.  I&#8217;m half confident that the Giants defense comes to play.  At least the pass rush.  Also, I guess playoff rules apply here.  This covers Simmons whole &#8220;shaky quarterback on the road in the playoffs&#8221; theory.  <b>Giants cover</b></p>
<h3>Pick 4</h3>
<p><b>Last Week</b>: 3-1 (32-28)<br />
We really tilted Week 15, which saw a solid 0 wins.  Then came back last week with 3.  We would like to take one final win in the league but, given our ability to win 3 instead of 4, it doesn&#8217;t look good.</p>
<p>Dolphins -1.5 over Jets<br />
Raiders -2.5 over Chargers<br />
Broncos -3.5 over Chiefs<br />
Giants -2.5 over Cowboys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/31/nfl-picks-2011-week-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks 2011: Week 16</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/24/nfl-picks-2011-week-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/24/nfl-picks-2011-week-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Picks 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SU: 8-8 (142-82) ATS: 7-9 (113-111) Thursday Texans -6.5 at Colts: Home dog on Thursday. Colts outright Sunday Raiders +1 at Chiefs: Must win game for the Raiders and the Chiefs are itching for a let-down following last week. Raiders outright Broncos -3 at Bills: Tebow. Broncos cover Jaguars +8 at Titans: I think last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SU: 8-8 (142-82)<br />
ATS: 7-9 (113-111)</p>
<h3>Thursday</h3>
<p><b>Texans -6.5 at Colts</b>:  Home dog on Thursday.  <b>Colts outright</b></p>
<h3>Sunday</h3>
<p><b>Raiders +1 at Chiefs</b>: Must win game for the Raiders and the Chiefs are itching for a let-down following last week.  <b>Raiders outright</b></p>
<p><b>Broncos -3 at Bills</b>: Tebow.  <b>Broncos cover</b></p>
<p><b>Jaguars +8 at Titans</b>: I think last week cured me of my irrational desire to take the Jaguars as a sexy pick to cover.  <b>Titans cover</b></p>
<p><b>Cards +4.5 at Bengals</b>: Did everyone know the Cardinals have won their last four in a row?  And also that this is basically a playoff game?  If we were betting on a Cardinals/Bengals playoff game, I guess we&#8217;d be more worried about the rookie coach/quarterback and think about the best player on the field, right?  <b>Cardinals outright</b></p>
<p><b>Dolphins +10.5 at Patriots</b>: It&#8217;s kind of tough to ever assume anyone&#8217;s going to cover big spreads at New England now, right?  <b>Dolphins +10.5</b></p>
<p><b>Browns +14.5 at Ravens</b>: The Ravens play down to their competition like the Giants.  <b>Browns +14.5</b></p>
<p><b>Giants +3 at Jets</b>: My favorite part of Rex Ryan is that he honestly believes that beating the Giants in a regular season game will crown the Jets the kings of New York.  You know who gets caught up in big brother/little brother debates?  Little brother.  That said, please don&#8217;t lose to the Jets.  <b>Giants outright</b></p>
<p><b>Vikings +6 at Redskins</b>: Eh.  <b>Redskins cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bucs +7 at Panthers</b>: The Bucs are dead.  Long live Superman.  <b>Panthers cover</b></p>
<p><b>Rams +14.5 at Steelers</b>: I&#8217;m pretty sure the Rams gave up a month ago, but I don&#8217;t think a team that normally plays slop is going to hang 40 on anyone with a hobbled QB.  <b>Rams +14.5</b></p>
<p><b>Chargers +2.5 at Lions</b>: It&#8217;s dumb to bet against the Chargers when they finally start their December roll, right?  <b>Chargers outright</b></p>
<p><b>Niners -3 at Seahawks</b>: If the Niners are vulnerable to Cardinals on the road, can we guess they&#8217;re vulnerable to the Seahawks on the road?  They have to be, right?  <b>Seahawks outright</b></p>
<p><b>Eagles +3 at Cowboys</b>: You know the funny thing about the Cowboys in a playoff game against the Eagles?  I really think the Eagles are better.  It&#8217;s fortunate for the division that they didn&#8217;t figure that out until too late.  <b>Eagles outright</b></p>
<p><b>Bears +12 at Packers</b>:  Packers.  Lambeau.  Expect 45.  <b>Packers cover</b></p>
<h3>Monday</h3>
<p><b>Falcons +7 at Saints</b>: Everyone&#8217;s going to use last week&#8217;s rout to forget the Falcons are not good on the road.  <b>Saints cover</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/24/nfl-picks-2011-week-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks 2011: Week 15</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/18/nfl-picks-2011-week-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/18/nfl-picks-2011-week-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Picks 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SU: 13-3 (134-74) ATS: 10-6 (106-102) Thursday Jaguars +11 at Falcons: Remember a few weeks back when I said there&#8217;s no lonelier feeling in the world than having Tavaris Jackson to win a game when the Patriots are being the Patriots? I was wrong. There is no lonelier feeling than white knighting a Jaguars pick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SU: 13-3 (134-74)<br />
ATS: 10-6 (106-102)</p>
<h3>Thursday</h3>
<p><b>Jaguars +11 at Falcons</b>: Remember a few weeks back when I said there&#8217;s no lonelier feeling in the world than having Tavaris Jackson to win a game when the Patriots are being the Patriots?  I was wrong.  There is no lonelier feeling than white knighting a Jaguars pick in the Pick 4 contest for an entire day, winning the argument, then watching that game unfold.  Going from, yeah they&#8217;re going to win to yeah they can still cover to yeah maybe they&#8217;ll take out Matt Ryan.  I&#8217;ve never felt worse about something in my gambling life.  As it turns out, while Thursday games are still slop, sometimes only one team turns in slop.  Also, if you started the Falcons defense, congratulations on your Fantasy Bowl win.  <b>Jaguars +11</b></p>
<h3>Saturday</h3>
<p><b>Cowboys -6 at Bucs</b>: Until I sat down to do these picks this morning, I had no idea this game was last night.  I spent most of the week, though, assuming that Dallas would woodshed Tampa.  Let&#8217;s not forget they probably should have won the last two games.  <b>Cowboys cover</b></p>
<h3>Sunday</h3>
<p><b>Redskins +7 at Giants</b>: In most cases, I&#8217;d never take one of these games to cover 7.  However, with an early season loss to avenge&#8230;. and Rex Grossman.  <b>Giants cover</b></p>
<p><b>Packers -14 at Chiefs</b>: Even though it&#8217;s Arrowhead, I&#8217;m not taking the Chiefs to be the team to knock off the Pack.  However, I&#8217;m also still anti &#8220;high points on the road&#8221; this year.  <b>Chiefs +14</b></p>
<p><b>Saints -7.5 at Vikings</b>: Peterson&#8217;s back.  That&#8217;s enough against this Saints defense to guess they&#8217;ll probably not cover more than a TD.  <b>Vikings +7.5</b></p>
<p><b>Seahawks +4.5 at Bears</b>: You know, after watching Tavaris Jackson on TV a couple weeks&#8230; I&#8217;m starting to come around to the fact he might not actually be a bad quarterback, but had a pretty shitty situation in Minnesota.  <b>Seahawks outright</b></p>
<p><b>Dolphins -1.5 at Bills</b>: It&#8217;s finally cold in the northeast, which means I&#8217;m taking the quarterback with the manly beard.  <b>Bills outright</b></p>
<p><b>Panthers +6.5 at Texans</b>: Texans.  Home.  I don&#8217;t like Superman that much.  <b>Texans cover</b></p>
<p><b>Titans -6.5 at Colts</b>: Boy, is my &#8220;home dog on Thursday&#8221; rule going to be put to the test next week, when the Colts get about 14 at home against the Texans.  <b>Titans cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bengals -3.5 at Rams</b>: Dear Steve: I have a feeling there will be a defensive coordinator job open in NY next season.  We&#8217;d love to have you back.  Love, Tom.  <b>Bengals cover</b></p>
<p><b>Lions +1 at Raiders</b>: This is pretty much the Raiders&#8217; last chance at the division.  I&#8217;m guessing the Patriots will take down the Tebows.  It&#8217;s all going to pretty much come down to if Suh can keep his own head and if the Raider line can prevent him from removing Palmer&#8217;s.  We&#8217;ll see.  <b>Raiders cover</b></p>
<p><b>Patriots -5.5 at Broncos</b>: Seriously folks&#8230; let&#8217;s all settle down.  <b>Patriots cover</b></p>
<p><b>Jets +1.5 at Eagles</b>: The Eagles are still playing for a 3-way 8-8 divisional tie.  Is Shonn Green the type of runningback to embarrass the Eagles?  I don&#8217;t think he is.  Welcome to Vickland, Jets&#8217; fans.  <b>Eagles cover</b></p>
<p><b>Browns +7 at Cardinals</b>:  It&#8217;s 1:00, so&#8230;.. <b>Cardinals cover</b></p>
<p><b>Ravens -2 at Chargers</b>: The Ravens are trash on the West Coast.  <b>Chargers outright</b></p>
<h3>Monday</h3>
<p><b>Steelers +2 at Niners</b>: Please.  <b>Steelers outright</b></p>
<h3>Pick 4</h3>
<p>Consecutive weeks of 3 wins.  Yay.</p>
<p>Jaguars +11.5 over Falcons<br />
Giants -7.5 over Redskins<br />
Raiders +0.5 over Lions<br />
Broncos +6.5 over Patriots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/18/nfl-picks-2011-week-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks 2011: Week 14</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/08/nfl-picks-2011-week-14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/08/nfl-picks-2011-week-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Picks 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SU: 10-6 (121-71) ATS: 10-6 (96-96) Thursday Browns +13.5 at Steelers: Thursday slop. Browns +13.5 Sunday Colts +15 at Ravens: Did you know that the Patriots allowing 3 garbage time touchdowns for the first time in Belicheck&#8217;s history as coach ruined my chance at $500 last week? Gambling&#8217;s wonderful. Ravens cover Texans +2.5 at Bengals: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>SU</b>: 10-6 (121-71)<br />
<b>ATS</b>: 10-6 (96-96)</p>
<h3>Thursday</h3>
<p><b>Browns +13.5 at Steelers</b>: Thursday slop.  <b>Browns +13.5</b></p>
<h3>Sunday</h3>
<p><b>Colts +15 at Ravens</b>: Did you know that the Patriots allowing 3 garbage time touchdowns for the first time in Belicheck&#8217;s history as coach ruined my chance at $500 last week?  Gambling&#8217;s wonderful.  <b>Ravens cover</b></p>
<p><b>Texans +2.5 at Bengals</b>: I&#8217;m in for the TJ Yates experience.  Maybe the Texans are just built that well.  <b>Texans outright</b></p>
<p><b>Raiders +12 at Jets</b>: I loved the Raiders to cover this until they lost yet another offensive player.  Now I like them to lose the division to TEBOW~!  <b>Packers cover</b></p>
<p><b>Chiefs +9 at Jets</b>: The Jets are due to drop a game and give the Giants the chance to knock them out of the playoffs.  Also, it&#8217;s possible Kyle Orton might be the best QB on the field.  And by possible I mean probable.  <b>Chiefs +9</b></p>
<p><b>Vikings +7 at Lions</b>: I know the Vikings are on the road and all, but we know they scored 30 on a really good defense last week, that the Lions apparently can&#8217;t collapse fast enough, they&#8217;re missing their best player on defense, it&#8217;s a divisional game, and the Vikings even without AP aren&#8217;t terrible.  <b>Vikings +7</b></p>
<p><b>Saints -5.5 at Titans</b>: This was a hotly debated pick in the Pick 4 pool.  I was fully in on the Saints (only -3.5 there) and others were fully in on the Titans.  Maybe hanging 40 on the world hasn&#8217;t been enough?  <b>Saints cover</b></p>
<p><b>Eagles +3 at Dolphins</b>: The Eagles are due for a bounceback game where they surprise everyone with a win.  Except the fact that I kind of think they quit, and a half-bye week isn&#8217;t going to help their sync.  And their defense still isn&#8217;t good.  <b>Dolphins cover</b></p>
<p><b>Patriots -8.5 at Redskins</b>: My argument against picking the Patriots this week was that apparently, in this new world where they give up garbage time TDs and take their foot off the gas, anyone can cover a touchdown against them.  What I&#8217;d say is &#8212; if the Redskins cover this spread, it&#8217;s really time to reevaluate what we know about Belicheck&#8217;s teams.  <b>Patriots cover</b></p>
<p><b>Falcons -2.5 at Panthers</b>: Not gonna lie&#8230;.. I got Superman.  <b>Panthers outright</b></p>
<p><b>Bucs -1 at Jaguars</b>: At this point, I&#8217;ll take the MJD express against terrible teams.  <b>Jaguars outright</b></p>
<p><b>Niners -4 at Cardinals</b>: You ever see a spread that&#8217;s so inexplicably low that it wraps back around and makes you convinced you&#8217;re missing something.  This is one of those times.  <b>Niners cover*</b></p>
<p><b>Bears +3 at Broncos</b>:  Tebow.  <b>Broncos cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bills +4.5 at Chargers</b>: Poor Buffalo.  <b>Chargers cover*</b></p>
<p><b>Giants +4 at Cowboys</b>: If everything I know about the Cowboys and the Giants hold true, the Cowboys will buckle in a high pressure, primetime, basically-a-playoff game.  The Giants will not.  Story and I&#8217;m sticking to it.  <b>Giants outright*</b></p>
<h3>Monday</h3>
<p><b>Rams +6.5 at Seahawks</b>: Did you know that if the Giants and Seahawks tie for the six-seed, the Seahawks would take a playoff game from the Giants again.  Boy, I can&#8217;t wait.  <b>Seahawks cover</b></p>
<h3>Pick 4</h3>
<p><b>Last Week</b>: 3-1 (29-23)<br />
The Patriots gave up 3 garbage time touchdowns.  Awesome.</p>
<p>Niners -3.5 over Cardinals<br />
Chargers -5.5 over Bills<br />
Giants +3.5 over Cowboys<br />
Seahawks -6.5 over Rams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/08/nfl-picks-2011-week-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TravelDL: Ireland 2011, Dublin to Galway</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/05/traveldl-ireland-2011-dublin-to-galway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/05/traveldl-ireland-2011-dublin-to-galway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travel-DL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Day 4 (Sunday, 7/31/2011) 8:30 AM: Boy do I hate early trains. But I do love Irish cabs. 9:00 AM: For everything I read about the Irish trains the most important tip appears to be this: buy your tickets on the website early. When we got to the train station &#8212; about 20 minutes before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Day 4 (Sunday, 7/31/2011)</b><br />
8:30 AM:  Boy do I hate early trains.  But I do love Irish cabs.</p>
<p>9:00 AM:  For everything I read about the Irish trains the most important tip appears to be this: buy your tickets on the website early.  When we got to the train station &#8212; about 20 minutes before the train &#8212; there was a line of about 75 people waiting for the one window that was open.  Nearly every website I read suggested <i>Iarnród Éireann</i> was run such that it made Amtrak look like a well-oiled machine and, at least in the station, this appears to be correct.  However, the kiosks were well oiled and running fine.  The trains were not quite as nice as the ones in England but, hey, you can&#8217;t have everything.</p>
<p>12:00 PM: Arrive Galway.  We decided to stay at the <a href=http://galwayhotels.jurysinns.com/ target=_blank>Jury&#8217;s Inn</a> in the Spanish Arch section of town.  This was a random choice.  What we didn&#8217;t realize is we probably could have walked right to the hotel.  So unfortunately we waited for a cab and took it&#8230;&#8230;. about six blocks.</p>
<p>12:15 PM: Breakfast&#8230;. and pizza.  The Spanish Arch section is quite crowded already.  I don&#8217;t know it yet, but we happen to be in Galway for the Galway Races.  It seems like Saratoga, but smaller.</p>
<p>2:00 PM: Back to the hotel to check in.  We get in to the room and it&#8217;s, well, interesting.  As it&#8217;s a European chain two very important things are missing: an air conditioner and a coffee maker.  Second weird thing, the hotel room contains a queen and a twin bed.  Pam claims the queen for herself.  It&#8217;s hard to say no to someone who just spent six weeks in a third world country&#8230;&#8230;.. but dammit I tried.</p>
<p>5:30 PM: We walk up the Spanish arch road to Eyre Square.  We go in to &#8220;The Skeff&#8221; which looks to be a small pub outside but turns out to be one of those sprawling locations with multiple bars and rooms inside.  I eat pub food and drink Guinness.  I remain happy.  We toss around the idea of just settling in here tonight and waiting for the promised bands.  Instead we decide to make it an earlyish night.</p>
<p>9:30 PM: And boy are we surprised.  While we knew tomorrow was a &#8220;bank holiday&#8221; and today was the &#8220;Galway Races&#8221;, what we didn&#8217;t know is that after the Races the town would be packed with people celebrating.  Our early night was intercepted by a block party.  And, in the baffling tradition of the Islands of the UK, the girls are dressed to the twelves in boob dresses and F-me heels while guys are in ratty T-shirts and jeans.  How do we bring this tradition to the states?</p>
<p>10:00 PM: Irish people drink.  This is only kind of a stereotype.  As I found out in Galway, though, the fighting part of it is not so accurate.  It&#8217;s much funnier, actually.  The bars we were walking in to were mobbed &#8212; like crowded as anything I&#8217;ve seen in New York crowded &#8212; but the bouncers were not giant or muscled.  They were mostly small dudes.  Their method of bouncing is thus: look at the guy&#8217;s eyes, if they have drunk look, they told them no.  Once inside, guys were removed with a touch to the back and a nod.  Nobody resisted, they just left.  It was amazing.</p>
<p><b>Day 5 (Monday, 8/1/2011)</b><br />
12:30 PM: We decided to take a slow day today and bum around the town.  For lunch, we went to the grocery store and bought a fine spread of Irish breads, chocolates, and cheeses and a bottle of wine.  I like that we could 1) do that and 2) eat it in the park.</p>
<p>8:00 PM: While we were walking around the town, we walked by a pub that was relatively close to our hotel.  It boasted nightly music.  So we decided to check it out that night and it turned out to be my favorite pub probably of the entire trip, <a href=http://www.monroes.ie/ target=_blank>Monroe&#8217;s</a>.  We sat down and began a night of Guinness and half-Guinness and this was where I witnessed some of the more baffling drink selections of the evening.  Big, burly Irishmen drinking Bulmer&#8217;s cider.  Women getting Coors&#8217; light with a glass of ice.  Pam drinking Guinness.  Everything was breaking loose.</p>
<p>8:30 PM: We asked for a menu because the guy next to us was eating pizza.  There was no pizza on the menu so we asked the guy where it came from.  He pointed to a secret red door behind the bar and said I had to go through the door to order pizza from the place next door and they&#8217;d bring it in to the bar.  After much debate, I walked through the secret door.  The pizza was amazing.  To sum up, I asked a Frenchman where he got the pizza, and he pointed me at a door which led to a pizza place run by Indians, which was being served to two Americans in an Irish pub.  I love the world.</p>
<p>9:00 PM: The band goes on, yay!  But it&#8217;s an electric guitar and a fiddle.  Boo!  But there&#8217;s inexplicably the Patriots/Ravens Wild Card game from last year.  Yay?</p>
<p><b>Day 6, (Tuesday, 8/2/2011)</b><br />
8:30 AM: As some of you know, PLR has been incredibly in to Flywheel Sports, which is a biking class based off Soulcycle.  Since she is a biking fiend of late, when we decided between Cliffs of Mohr and the Aran Islands, we decided to pick the one where we could rent bikes and go off on our own all day.  As you know, we suck at full day tours with people.  This seemed to be the best compromise.  We decided to use <a href=http://www.fahertytours.com/ target=_blank>Faherty Tours</a> to get us to the Aran Islands and then we&#8217;d have a full day to ourselves on rented bikes.  Now, I have not ridden a bike since I moved to Manhattan six years ago.  PLR rides them daily.  You can see where this is going.</p>
<p>9:00 AM: We are picked up by a minivan and head toward the docks where we&#8217;ll pick up a ferry to the island.  We get a small lesson in Gaelic including hello, good-bye, thank you, and some cusswords.</p>
<p>10:00 AM: We get our bikes &#8212; pretty durable 18-speed bikes with optional helmets.  For the first time in my life, and I&#8217;m not proud of this, I wore a bicycle helmet.  I felt super lame, but I wasn&#8217;t sure what we&#8217;d be riding through.</p>
<p>10:30 AM: I wanted to do one thing on the island, which was to go to a Celtic Fort that dated back some absurd number of years.  I can&#8217;t really put in to words how hard it was to get up there.  We rode the bikes up hill until the paved road turned in to large cobblestones.  Then eventually we had to get off the bikes because the cobblestones were so loose we couldn&#8217;t ride on them.  We were, however, rewarded with a pretty awesome view which, eventually, I will upload pics to Facebook.  As it turns out, the secret to enjoying cool tourist things without a lot of tourists is to make it really exhausting to get to.</p>
<p>5:00 PM: We head back on the ferry and I have a pretty cool talk with the tour guide.  He teaches me some words in Gaelic which I promptly forgot.  As it turns out, the reason the island hasn&#8217;t been invaded with hotels is because it&#8217;s illegal to build a house on the island unless you were born on the island.  Even folks who buy houses on the island are not allowed to change their land unless they apply for permission.  It appears the entire island is run by the NYC Landmark Committee.</p>
<p>6:30 PM: I was exhausted when we got back to the hotel.  PLR was in better shape because of her recent dedication to Spin class.  I was dead on my feet.  However, I still really wanted to see Irish music, so we decided to return to Monroe&#8217;s.</p>
<p>8:00 PM: Success!  The band is a fiddle, flute, guitar, and drum.  This is what I wanted.  And it&#8217;s apparently dance night!  Irish music achievement unlocked!</p>
<p>Next: Limerick and the mayor of King John&#8217;s Castle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/05/traveldl-ireland-2011-dublin-to-galway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks 2011: Week 13</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/04/nfl-picks-2011-week-13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/04/nfl-picks-2011-week-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Picks 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SU: 11-5 (111-65) ATS: 9-7 (86-90) It appears I missed a week. Thursday Eagles -2 at Seahawks: Home dog on Thursday rule. Seahawks outright Sunday Titans +1.5 at Bills: Now that the Bills appear to be safely out of it, they can grab a home game. Bills cover Chiefs +8 at Bears: How done is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SU: 11-5 (111-65)<br />
ATS: 9-7 (86-90)</p>
<p>It appears I missed a week.</p>
<h3>Thursday</h3>
<p><b>Eagles -2 at Seahawks</b>: Home dog on Thursday rule.  <b>Seahawks outright</b></p>
<h3>Sunday</h3>
<p><b>Titans +1.5 at Bills</b>: Now that the Bills appear to be safely out of it, they can grab a home game.  <b>Bills cover</b></p>
<p><b>Chiefs +8 at Bears</b>: How done is Donovan McNabb if the Bears won&#8217;t even sign him to back up Caleb Hanie?  Like, superdone, right?  <b>Chiefs +8</b></p>
<p><b>Raiders +3 at Dolphins</b>: We all remember that the Dolphins were considered bad not three weeks ago, right?  And also that they really don&#8217;t play well at home?  <b>Raiders outright</b></p>
<p><b>Bengals +7.5 at Steelers</b>: In the general case, the Steelers win sloppy and the Bengals cover spreads.  <b>Bengals +7.5</b></p>
<p><b>Ravens -7 at Browns</b>: It would appear the Browns can only really play the Bengals in the division.  <b>Ravens cover</b></p>
<p><b>Jets -3.5 at Redskins</b>: I wanted this as a pick 4 selection.  Reason being is that the Redskins win last week was a fluke.  Rex Grossman made a Rex Grossman throw and it happened to be caught instead of intercepted.  I find that less likely against the Jets.  <b>Jets cover</b></p>
<p><b>Falcons +1 at Texans</b>:  This is one of those things where you wonder if the QB is even necessary to the Texans success.  I&#8217;m gonna say it is.  <b>Falcons outright</b></p>
<p><b>Panthers +3.5 at Bucs</b>: When you talk about how important winning is to the storyline in the NFL, look no further than Cam Newton.  He&#8217;s pretty awesome and an afterthought.  Tebow is pretty awful and is the national story because the Broncos keep winning.  Go figure.  <b>Panthers +3.5</b></p>
<p><b>Colts +21 at Patriots</b>: The only way the Patriots don&#8217;t cover this spread is if Bill Belicheck decides to try and cover it with his back up QB to be squirrely.  <b>Patriots cover</b></p>
<p><b>Broncos +1.5 at Vikings</b>:  Tebow.  <b>Broncos outright</b></p>
<p><b>Rams +13 at Niners</b>: I don&#8217;t love the Niners to cover huge spreads yet.  I can&#8217;t get on board.  <b>Rams +13</b></p>
<p><b>Cowboys -6.5 at Cards</b>: Smells like a trap.  <b>Cards +6.5</b></p>
<p><b>Packers -6.5 at Giants</b>: I hate this game, mostly because I want to believe that the Giants will stop the slide by doing what they do &#8212; play a great game against a team that should wallop them.  The problem: by the end of last week&#8217;s game, the Giants were rushing 3 and Brees was STILL picking them apart.  The only way I&#8217;d like the Giants in this game is if the entire first string defense was playing.  It&#8217;s not.  <b>Giants +6.5</b></p>
<p><b>Lions +7.5 at Saints</b>: No Suh?  After what I just watched?  <b>Saints cover</b></p>
<h3>Monday</h3>
<p><b>Chargers -3 at Jaguars</b>: The Chargers have been waiting for a team to unleash hell on.  A team that just had a coach tossed?  Yup.  <b>Chargers cover</b></p>
<h3>Pick 4</h3>
<p>The Redskins stupid fluke win last week ruined a win.  It ruined it so bad I wasn&#8217;t allowed to use the home dog on Thursday rule by my partners.  I&#8217;ve had great fun rubbing it in their face for two days.</p>
<p><b>Last Week</b>: 3-1 (26-22)</p>
<p>Broncos -0.5 over Vikings<br />
Patriots -20.5 over Colts<br />
Saints -7.5 over Lions<br />
Chargers -2.5 over Jaguars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/12/04/nfl-picks-2011-week-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks 2011: Week 12</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/11/27/nfl-picks-2011-week-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/11/27/nfl-picks-2011-week-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 07:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Picks 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SU: 9-5 (100-60) ATS: 6-8 (77-83) Thursday Packers -6 at Lions: I chose these games on Facebook. I suppose you can choose not to believe me, but I was dumb enough to pick Lions +6 and admit it publicly. Dolphins +7 at Cowboys: Too many points. Dolphins +7 Niners +3.5 at Ravens: While the west [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>SU</b>: 9-5 (100-60)<br />
<b>ATS</b>: 6-8 (77-83)</p>
<h3>Thursday</h3>
<p><b>Packers -6 at Lions</b>: I chose these games on Facebook.  I suppose you can choose not to believe me, but I was dumb enough to pick <b>Lions +6</b> and admit it publicly.</p>
<p><b>Dolphins +7 at Cowboys</b>: Too many points.  <b>Dolphins +7</b></p>
<p><b>Niners +3.5 at Ravens</b>: While the west coast team traveling east been overblown, it hasn&#8217;t been overblown on 3 days rest.  <b>Ravens cover*</b></p>
<h3>Sunday</h3>
<p><b>Cardinals +3 at Rams</b>: While I don&#8217;t like picking games on some kind of gambler&#8217;s fallacy mojo &#8212; a 3rd consecutive road game is very hard to win.  <b>Rams cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bills +8 at Jets</b>: Are we really trusting the Jets to dismantle the Bills by 2 scores for the second time in four weeks?  Really?  <b>Bills outright</b></p>
<p><b>Browns +7 at Bengals</b>: Hey, it&#8217;s the game that knocked me out of all my Pick&#8217;em Pools in Week 1.  And I&#8217;m picking the same team again.  <b>Bengals cover</b></p>
<p><b>Texans -3 at Jaguars</b>: I know in the world of today&#8217;s NFL that a guy isn&#8217;t any good if he&#8217;s not good out of the gate.  Here&#8217;s the thing: we&#8217;re assuming that Ken Whisenhunt knows something about quarterbacks when, before now, his only quarterback decision was &#8220;start the hall of famer over the rookie.&#8221;  Remember how we wrote off David Carr because he got sacked like 150 times in a season and now he&#8217;s a back-up somewhere?  I think Leinart&#8217;s going to be pretty good.  And I think he&#8217;s going to start somewhere next year.  <b>Texans cover*</b></p>
<p><b>Panthers -3.5 at Colts</b>: So Painter&#8217;s still starting, the Colts are not even examining signing Kyle Randy Orton, Carson Palmer was available for the first seven weeks, and we&#8217;re still pretending the Colts are trying to win football games?  Will the league examine this?  No?  <b>Panthers cover</b></p>
<p><b>Bucs +3.5 at Titans</b>: Two mediocre teams?  Home team.  <b>Titans cover</b></p>
<p><b>Vikings +8.5 at Falcons</b>:  While I kinda hate the Falcons to cover a large spread, can you find 20 points for the Vikings without the threat of Adrian Peterson?  I can&#8217;t.  <b>Falcons cover*</b></p>
<p><b>Bears +3.5 at Raiders</b>: I saw the dawning of the Caleb Hanie era last year.  It wasn&#8217;t atrocious, but I wouldn&#8217;t bet on it either.  <b>Raiders cover</b></p>
<p><b>Redskins +4.5 at Seahawks</b>: OK, so let&#8217;s pretend the Skins threw everything in to a divisional game and still lost by a point.  Now let&#8217;s pretend they have to go to the other coast and not get clobbered.  <b>Seahawks cover*</b></p>
<p><b>Patriots -4.5 at Eagles</b>: Stupid Eagles.  The lesson here is when creating a rule about not betting on an NFC East team with more than 3 points to stick to it.  Also, heck no.  <b>Patriots cover</b></p>
<p><b>Broncos +6.5 at Chargers</b>: Tebow.  Points.  I&#8217;m in.  <b>Broncos +6.5</b></p>
<p><b>Steelers -10 at Chiefs</b>: Will a bye week be enough to keep this game within 10?  I don&#8217;t think so.  <b>Steelers cover</b></p>
<h3>Monday</h3>
<p><b>Giants +6.5 at Saints</b>: The loss to the Eagles is really bad.  It&#8217;s not unexpected, really, as that&#8217;s how this division works, but really bad.  The Giants don&#8217;t have an easy game left on their schedule.  The Cowboys only have two games left against over .500 teams.  Both of those teams are the Giants.  If the Giants can&#8217;t knock off either New Orleans or Green Bay, the Cowboys are going to blow past them in a division they should have had in hand.  No sir&#8230;. I don&#8217;t like it.  <b>Giants +6.5</b></p>
<h3>Pick 4</h3>
<p>Last Week: 1-3 (23-21)<br />
Ravens -3.5 over Niners<br />
Falcons -8.5 over Vikings<br />
Texans -3.5 over Jaguars<br />
Seahawks -4.5 over Redskins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/11/27/nfl-picks-2011-week-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks 2011 &#8211; Week 11</title>
		<link>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/11/20/nfl-picks-2011-week-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/11/20/nfl-picks-2011-week-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Picks 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/?p=3971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SU: 6-10 (91-55) ATS: 8-8 (71-75) Thursday Jets -4.5 at Broncos: Twitter pick. Jets cover*. I hated this pick when we made it&#8230; for the primary reason that 1) I love home underdogs on the Thursday night game in general. 2) You don&#8217;t taunt Happy Fun Tebow. 3) I didn&#8217;t think the Jets were good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>SU</b>: 6-10 (91-55)<br />
<b>ATS</b>: 8-8 (71-75)</p>
<h3>Thursday</h3>
<p><b>Jets -4.5 at Broncos</b>: <a href=https://twitter.com/#!/tdphillipsjr/status/137327801475940353>Twitter pick</a>.  Jets cover*.  I hated this pick when we made it&#8230; for the primary reason that 1) I love home underdogs on the Thursday night game in general.  2) You don&#8217;t taunt Happy Fun Tebow. 3) I didn&#8217;t think the Jets were good enough to fly across two time zones, adjust to the environment in Denver, and play a football game in 3 days.  4) YOU DO NOT TAUNT HAPPY FUN TEBALL.  But seriously, unless it&#8217;s the Lions on Thanksgiving (historically) Thursday night games are slop.  Slop favors home.  Give me home and points, I&#8217;ll take it every single time.  I was overruled.  We lost.  I have been insufferable since.  For what it&#8217;s worth, my picks were Denver, Buffalo, Jacksonville, and NYG.  It ended up being NYJ, Buffalo, Detroit, and NYG.</p>
<h3>Sunday</h3>
<p><b>Titans +6.5 at Falcons</b>: I&#8217;d make the suggestion here that the Titans are a team I can&#8217;t get any handle on this season, but if my picks these last two weeks were any indication, I don&#8217;t have much of a grasp on anything.  I don&#8217;t like this game for a couple of reasons &#8212; first of which the head coach thinks the defense is so bad that he conceded the game to go for it in a situation when they still had to go 40 yards for a field goal.  Oh, and the Falcons already kinda suck on the road.  <b>Titans +6.5</b></p>
<p><b>Bills +2 at Dolphins</b>: I mean, come on people.  Two bad beats by two good teams is not quite enough to make the Bills an underdog against a team who, as recently as 3 weeks ago, we were questioning if they&#8217;d win a game this season.  <b>Bills outright</b></p>
<p><b>Bengals +7.5 at Ravens</b>: Can we officially rename the Ravens to The Frustrating Baltimore Ravens?  I mean, squeaking out a win vs the Cardinals, followed by beating the Steelers, followed by dropping a game to the Seahawks?  I hate everything about this pick.  <b>Bengals +7.5</b></p>
<p><b>Jaguars +1 at Browns</b>: I understand the Jags aren&#8217;t a very good team, but it would appear the Browns are physically unable to 1) score and 2) win a game at home.  The Jaguars aren&#8217;t really &#8220;good&#8221; by any means, but it seems like any mediocre team is able to beat the Browns in their building.  <b>Jaguars outright</b></p>
<p><b>Raiders +1.5 at Vikings</b>: This has all the makings of another sneaky loss for the Raiders.  They like dropping the occasional stinkbomb just to keep their fans on their sorry toes.  I must say, though, they&#8217;d be in much better shape if they had Kyle Boller and their draft picks.  I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d still be playing to keep a division lead.  <b>Raiders outright</b></p>
<p><b>Panthers +7 at Lions</b>: The Lions have been waiting on another bad team to bully around.  Especially considering the Bears, arguably, embarassed the crap out of them last week.  I think they win huge here and, man, is Lions +8 going to be a tempting Thursday night pick.  <b>Lions outright</b></p>
<p><b>Bucs +13 at Packers</b>: At this point, there&#8217;s not a spread you can give me at Lambeau big enough to not take the Packers.  I also realize I don&#8217;t like picking the Bucs&#8230;. I just like making JAAAAASH Freeman references.  <b>Packers cover</b></p>
<p><b>Cowboys -8 at Redskins</b>: Man there are a lot of things to hate about taking the Cowboys here.  First it&#8217;s an NFC East game with more than 3 points.  Second, this is the type of game in the division that turn in to shocking upsets.  But&#8230;&#8230;. the Redskins STILL have nothing to make me believe they can score any points.  The rule is never take more than 3 points unless you really mean it.  I really mean it.  <b>Cowboys cover</b></p>
<p><b>Cardinals +9.5 at Niners</b>: Apparently John Skelton is good enough to discover the &#8220;throw the shit to Larry Fitzgerald&#8221; plan.  <b>Cardinals +9.5</b></p>
<p><b>Seahawks +2.5 at Rams</b>: Seahawks on the road.  <b>Rams cover</b></p>
<p><b>Chargers +4 at Bears</b>:  The Chargers are holding on to some basic respect&#8230; but they certainly seem to have given up.  Too bad they fired a way better coach off a 14-2 season.  Eli totes should have played there.  <b>Bears cover</b></p>
<p><b>Eagles +3.5 at Giants</b>:  I hate this game.  This has all the indications of one of those stupid NFC East games where a dead team does their last gasp, get after it one more time, to screw another divisional team and gamblers all at the same time.  Here&#8217;s the thing, the Niners are for real and very good, but on the 4th and 2 play that ended the game if Eli happens to turn his head an inch to his right, he sees a wide-open Demarcus Ware who walks in to the end zone for a touchdown.  Them&#8217;s the breaks.  However, in this case, I still don&#8217;t see a universe in which anyone tackles Brandon Jacobs.  Ever.  They don&#8217;t have a single tackling linebacker.  If Jacobs breaks through the defensive line&#8230; he scores.  Every time.  What I&#8217;m saying is: start Brandon Jacobs.  As a happy aside, I think Andy Reid&#8217;s going to get fired and my nightmare of Andy Reid and Vince Young haunting my soul for the next decade won&#8217;t come to fruition.  <b>Giants cover</b></p>
<h3>Monday</h3>
<p><b>Chiefs +12 at Patriots</b>: Boy, did everyone overrate that four game win streak by the Chiefs or what?  <b>Patriots cover</b></p>
<h3>Pick 4</h3>
<p>Last Week: 2-2 (22-18)</p>
<p>Jets -4.5 over Chiefs :(<br />
Lions -6.5 over Panthers<br />
Bills +2.5 over Dolphins<br />
Giants -3.5 over Eagles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tdphillipsjr.com/2011/11/20/nfl-picks-2011-week-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

